Onboarding Is a Learning Experience

Why don't more companies treat it like one?

Share

I recently attended a conference, and one of the talks was on the importance of a good onboarding experience. It was a great talk, and something from the discussion afterward stuck with me. A senior software engineer asked how to better handle his team’s onboarding because he “had produced a ton of documentation that nobody seems to read”.

In the industry, I have observed that onboarding processes are, pun intended, all over the board.

The best onboarding programs share the same DNA as the best learning experiences. They have clear learning objectives, provide pacing expectations, and scaffold complexity by starting with fundamentals before progressing to advanced topics. When done well, these programs provide hands-on practice in safe environments, with checkpoints to ensure understanding.

Yet most companies treat onboarding as a checklist. They dump information rather than designing for retention. They prioritize coverage over comprehension. Ironically, one of the sales tactics for hire-train-deploy programs is a “faster time to productivity”, as if companies can’t do this themselves with a proper onboarding system.

When I mentor junior developers, one of the questions I encourage them to ask a potential employer is “What does success look like 1, 3, 6, and 12 months into this role?” Imagine how impressive your company would be if the hiring manager could pull up a detailed onboarding plan with high-quality, asynchronous learning punctuated by synchronous mentorship.

Not a checklist, not a Google doc, not having someone on staff just “wing it”. An actual, measurable experience.

And when upper management asks, “How is the new hire doing?”, you’d be able to show them exactly where they are in the process and how they are performing compared to a rubric.

The companies that treat onboarding as a designed learning experience see dramatically different outcomes. New hires become productive faster. Teams spend less time firefighting onboarding questions. Knowledge becomes consistent and scalable. Employees feel confident and supported from day one.

Your Team isn’t Trained to Deliver Learning

If you’re reading this and recognizing gaps in your own organization, welcome to the club. Most companies recognize that their onboarding process could be improved. The challenge is finding the time and expertise to build something effective.

What we usually see is a few team members in a room, none of whom have pedagogical training, putting together a checklist of things they should cover. That’s a good start. In fact, that’s where I start when building these programs. Backwards design is a technique where we start with the end in mind. What competencies should the new hire have at each stage of the journey? Then we work backwards to build the pathway to get there.

But a list of objectives isn’t enough. Good learning experience design is a skill. It requires understanding how people learn, how to sequence information, how to create practice opportunities, and how to measure whether learning actually happened.

As a side note, measuring whether learning actually happened is the biggest challenge that AI has thrown at educators. Output is not necessarily correlated with competency. (It never really was, but now it can be faked at scale with a $20 tool)

It is unfair to ask your team members, who have other responsibilities, to design and implement a structure that respects your new hires’ time, preserves your team’s focus, and sets everyone up for success.

The Benefits are Massive

Having an instructional design team work with your groups provides real, measurable ROI. Here’s a quick list of both tangible and intangible benefits that compound as your organization grows:

Short-Term Gains

  1. Accelerated time-to-productivity: New hires can complete their first meaningful tasks faster.
  2. Reduced support burden: Senior team members spend less time answering repetitive onboarding questions and resolving common issues.
  3. Lower anxiety and higher confidence: When a new hire clearly understands what is expected within a specific timeframe, they will spend less time worrying and more time working.
  4. Consistent baseline knowledge: Every new hire receives the same foundational information, eliminating knowledge gaps and reducing variance among mentors.

Middle-Term Gains

  1. Measurable competency development: You can track progress against a rubric instead of guessing. If a new hire requires correction or intervention, you can now clearly articulate it and show them where they are falling short. And, in the unfortunate case where they don’t work out, you’re well-positioned with documentation.
  2. Reduced attrition: Employees who feel supported in their onboarding period are more likely to stay and be more engaged.
  3. Increased quality: Proper training reduces the likelihood of production incidents due to knowledge gaps.
  4. Increased security and compliance: Training is documented, tracked, and verifiable for audits.
  5. Improved mentor morale: Existing employees who are asked to mentor new hires appreciate not having to be the primary source of knowledge.

The Multiplier Effect

I never call any of my learning experiences “finished”. A key part of maintaining an effective learning experience is continuous improvement, but when done well, the benefits over time are awesome. Your 10th hire benefits from refinements learned from the first 9. Your 50th has access to an even more polished experience.

The documentation that “nobody reads” transforms into an interactive experience that hits those dopamine buttons with visual, measurable progress. The tribal knowledge becomes institutional knowledge.

If you’re interested in building an onboarding experience that will set you apart from your competitors and save you time and money, get in touch, and let’s talk about what a well-designed onboarding program could look like for your teams.